California is set to outlaw nonconsensual condom removal - and rightly so 1 month ago

California is set to outlaw nonconsensual condom removal - and rightly so

This week, California is set to make history by becoming the first state to specifically outlaw the non-consensual removal of condoms during sex, which is colloquially referred to as 'stealthing'.

The Bill, which was introduced by California Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia, passed both houses of California's legislature, and now awaits Governor Gavin Newsom's signature.

Advertisement

When it is enacted, the Civil Offense Bill will allow victims to sue men who remove condoms without their consent during sex. However, as The Guardian reports, it does not create the possibility that the perpetrators will serve prison time.

New York and Wisconsin are expected to follow in California's footsteps, though if passed, their bills will have criminal provisions.

While California's Bill falls short in terms of criminal litigation, it is certainly a step in the right direction when it comes to specifically addressing 'stealthing' which is, by all accounts, sexual assault, and according to statistics, all too prevalent.

A study published in the National Library of Medicine found that 12% of women have experienced non-consensual condom removal, while 10% of men admitted to doing so.

One anonymous man who admitted to stealthing in the past said he did so because he said sex "feels better with no condom one". In an interview with the Australian publication Hack, he said: "I really don't want to get them pregnant so I definitely wouldn't be leaving a trace. As for STIs, I don't want to get them but I would run the risk."

Non-consensual condom removal doesn't just undermine the consent of the partner, it puts them at risk of considerable harm, including sexually transmitted infections as well as unwanted pregnancies. In some instances, tampering with or removing condoms during sex is regarded as reproductive coercion.

Advertisement

While there is no explicit reference to stealthing in Irish law, it can be classified as sexual assault or rape.

Speaking in 2020 to The Irish Times, Noeline Blackwell, the chief executive of the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre said: "What constitutes consent is an area that wasn’t always clear until the 2017 Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act, which says that a person consents to a sexual act if they freely and willingly agree to engage in that act. So if the nature of the act they’ve agreed to is protected sex, and someone deceitfully removes that protection, then the other person is mistaken as to what is happening.

"Because they’re mistaken, it is now set out that if intercourse occurs, there’s a case to be made for rape. It is nonconsensual at the time the person removes – or doesn’t put on – the condom."

Indeed, nonconsensual condom removal is a dangerous violation of consent that, in many countries, constitutes rape. By explicitly addressing stealthing in its law, California takes a step in the right direction. It's up to other jurisdictions to follow suit and treat the offence for what it truly is - an act of sexual abuse.

If you have been affected by any of the details of this article, you can contact Women's Aid's 24 hour helpline on 1800 341 900 and the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre on  1800 77 8888.

Advertisement