News

Share
12th November 2016
11:41am GMT

The Supreme Court ruling outlined how Irish law allows for the defence of a subjective “honest belief” on the part of the accused that the victim had consented.
Irish law says the presence or absence of “reasonable grounds for such a belief” was something a jury should have considered.
Calls for consent to be defined comes from the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre, who say that the definition needs to be strengthened. Speaking on Drivetime, CEO Noeline Blackwell said:''What if a man genuinely believes a woman consents – is that a good defence? Even if the belief is kind of off the wall?
What the judges said was ‘Yes, if a man genuinely beliefs that the woman gave consent, then no matter how unreasonable that belief is, then it is a good defence and he will not be convicted of rape.''
Explore more on these topics: