
Share
14th June 2022
11:17am BST

The case drew global attention due to the irony of the fictional essay Crampton Brophy had self-published years earlier about murdering her husband.
It was not allowed to be used as evidence in trial.
However, prosecutors did not need it. Jurors were shown surveillance footage of Crampton Brady driving to and from the Institute at the time of the crime.
Prosecutors also told the jury that about how the couple had been facing financial difficulties at the time of the murder and Crampton Brady had researched and purchased a 'ghost gun' online.
Ghost guns are unserialised and untraceable firearms that can be bought online and assembled at home.
Crampton Brophy’s attorney said the purchase of a ghost gun was research for a new novel.
She also brought in witnesses who testified that the couple had a good, loving relationship.
Crampton Brophy took the stand to say she and her husband had both purchased life insurance policies as part of their retirement planning.
The jury decided that Crampton Brophy had indeed murdered her husband for financial gain.Explore more on these topics: