
Life

Share
22nd October 2017
04:40pm BST

This is Patrick's thread. https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/920086917043097601 https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/920088083768446976 https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/920089167765426179 Patrick goes on to say that this question should be used to "call out" those who claim to believe that life begins at conception. He says that a lot of the time, people miss the point and believe that pro-choice people see embryos as without value entirely. Instead, Patrick posits that they are of course valuable and that they are alive... just not as valuable and not as alive as a living, breathing child. Or a living, breathing woman, for that matter. https://twitter.com/Rebels4Choice/status/921664902363795456 While Patrick's question does not entirely 'destroy' the pro-life argument as some people online have suggested, it does prove the flimsiness of the life-begins-at-conception argument. His thread has also been shared over 27,000 times on Twitter. So, if anything, it's at least given a lot of people something to think about.It's a simple scenario with two outcomes. No one ever wants to pick one, because the correct answer destroys their argument. And there IS a correct answer, which is why the pro-life crowd hates the question. 2/
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) October 17, 2017
Explore more on these topics: