Have we got another Keanu Reeves situation on our hands?

Paul Rudd turned 50 this weekend. A massive congrats to all involved as the comedy and sometimes-vaguely-serious-actor hit the mid-century mark much to the delight and surprise of many who couldn't quite believe that that's how old he is. This was less to do with Rudd being 50-years-old, and more to do with the fact that he doesn't appear to have aged a day since he was about 21. Or, in fact, that he's actually ageing backwards. Let us take a look at some evidence as posited by the good people of Twitter and brought to you by none other than Getty Images. Here's Paul Rudd this year, aged almost 50. And here he is in 2004, aged 35. Here's Paul Rudd this year, aged almost 50. And here he is in 2002, aged 33. Here's Paul Rudd this year, aged almost 50. And here he is in 1997, aged 22. People were, naturally, blown away by the information that Paul Rudd must simply be a vampire. They took to Twitter to express their thoughts. https://twitter.com/frikingout/status/1114655997946204160 https://twitter.com/canustfuplease/status/1114619228194267140 https://twitter.com/Jeesseessee/status/1114602848497618944 https://twitter.com/lokiurie/status/1114713429351256064 Others, however, weren't buying it and were more adamant that Paul Rudd is just good looking. https://twitter.com/csydelko/status/1114661478760456193 But what is the truth? We may never know.