
Share
19th October 2017
03:42pm BST

He also only received a beverage on the outgoing flight and not the returning one.
However, as his lawyer states, Daniel isn't suing them over simply not serving him bubbly, but instead "misleading marketing," which is fair.
His lawyer, Sébastien Paquette, told the BBC: “It's not about the pettiness of champagne versus sparkling wine.
“It's the consumer message behind it.”
The lawsuit further asks for financial compensation of the difference between the price of a glass of champagne and a glass of prosecco, as well as damages.
A bit much or fair enough?